| Main Title |
A user's guide to IPX, the in-place pollutant export water quality modeling framework. Version 2.7.4 / |
| Author |
Velleux, Mark.;
Westenbroek, S.;
Ruppel, J.;
Settles, M.;
Endicott, D.
|
| CORP Author |
Environmental Research Lab.-Duluth, Grosse Ile, MI. Large Lakes Research Station. ;OAO Corp., Washington, DC. ;Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources, Madison. |
| Publisher |
[Environmental Protection Agency], Office of Research and Development, National Health and Ecological Effects Research Laboratory, Mid-Continent Ecology Division, Large Lakes Research Station. Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources., |
| Place Published |
{Washington, D.C.? : |
| Year Published |
2000 |
| Report Number |
EPA/600/R-01/074 |
| Stock Number |
PB2002-104620 |
| OCLC Number |
51627855 |
| Subjects |
Water quality management;
Mathematical models;
Pollutants;
Sediments;
Contaminants;
Water pollution control;
Polychlorinated biphenyls;
Environmental transport;
Surface waters;
Sediment-water interfaces;
Remediation;
Case studies;
User guide;
Great Lakes;
Implementation;
Mass balance;
IPX(In-Place Pollutant eXport model)
|
| Internet Access |
|
| Holdings |
| Library |
|
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Date Modified |
| ERBD |
|
PB2002-104620 |
|
NERL/ESD-LV Library/Las Vegas,NV |
06/20/2003 |
| NTIS |
|
PB2002-104620 |
Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. |
NTIS |
01/01/1988 |
|
| Collation |
196 pages : illustrations, charts |
| Abstract |
The need to consider the environmental benefits and consequences of various management options continues to intensify as (1) environmental problems become more complex, (2) the Means necessary to solve problems become more technical, time-consuming, and expensive, and (3) the costs to implement remedial strategies increase. Decisions which include remediation must be weighed carefully against the costs and effectiveness of the solutions. One environmental problem receiving considerable attention is that of contaminated sediments. The primary question is whether contaminated sediments should be remediated or left in place. Contaminated sediments are typically a legacy issue; however, continuing loads from other point and non-point sources confound clear solutions. Given the reality of limited funds for clean-up, environmental managers need to define what degree of remediation would achieve desired results and which sites are the priorities. In this regard, managers must justify expenditures and need to understand the environmental improvements expected to result from any remedial action on both local and lake-wide scales. |
| Notes |
Cover title. Includes bibliographical references. "EPA/600/R-01/074 November 2001." Microfiche. |
| Supplementary Notes |
Prepared in cooperation with OAO Corp., Washington, DC. and Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources, Madison. |
| Availability Notes |
Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; and email at orders@ntis.gov. NTIS is located at 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA, 22161, USA. |
| Author Added Ent |
|
| Corporate Au Added Ent |
Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources. ; Mid-Continent Ecology Division. Large Lakes Research Station, Grosse, Ile, Michigan. |
| PUB Date Free Form |
2001. |
| NTIS Prices |
PC A10/MF A03 |
| BIB Level |
m |
| Medium |
microform |
| OCLC Time Stamp |
20030620140036 |
| Cataloging Source |
OCLC/T |
| Language |
eng |
| Origin |
OCLC |
| Type |
MERGE |
| OCLC Rec Leader |
01427cam 2200289K 45020 |
