Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 67 OF 247

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Development of Criteria for Siting Air Monitoring Stations.
Author Ott., Wayne R. ;
CORP Author Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Office of Research and Development.
Year Published 1977
Report Number EPA/600/J-77/048;
Stock Number PB-273 974
Additional Subjects Air quality ; Monitoring ; Sites ; Mathematical models ; Statistical analysis ; Concentration(Composition) ; Reprints ; Air pollution sampling ; Air monitoring stations
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
NTIS  PB-273 974 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. 06/23/1988
Collation 7p
Abstract
This paper reviews relevant research findings for the purpose of establishing a set of uniform national criteria for designating locations of air monitoring stations. Data first are presented showing the difficulty, in the absence of uniform criteria, of interpreting measurements from one station in a city to determine if air quality for that city is 'better' or 'worse' than that for another city. Then, research data are given showing, for example, that proximity to traffic (in both the horizontal and vertical directions) affects measured carbon monoxide concentrations. Finally, a scheme is presented for classifying all monitoring stations into six different siting categories. Type A stations are designed to provide a realistic measure of pedestrian exposures, while Type B measures the background concentration extending over a large physical area. Type C stations monitor residential or suburban population exposures. Types D, E, and F are for more specialized purposes, such as collecting meteorological information and conducting air quality surveys. Types A, B, and C, which are most important in implementing air quality standards, must have a uniform probe height of 3 + or - 1/2 meters. A standardized system of site selection, such as the one proposed here, should greatly improve the comparability and meaningfulness of data obtained from different air monitoring stations throughout the Nation.