Main Title |
Review of the national ambient air quality standards for lead : assessment of scientific and technical information : OAQPS staff report. |
Author |
Cohen, J. ;
Brion, G. ;
Haines., J.
|
CORP Author |
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. |
Publisher |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, |
Year Published |
1990 |
Report Number |
EPA-450/2-89-022 |
Stock Number |
PB91-206185 |
OCLC Number |
24228161 |
Subjects |
Air quality--Standards
|
Additional Subjects |
Lead(Metal) ;
Air pollution effects(Humans) ;
Public health ;
National Ambient Air Quality Standards ;
Risk assessment ;
Reviews ;
Air pollution standards ;
Technology transfer ;
Exposure ;
Biological effects ;
Ecosystems ;
Toxicity ;
Standards compliance ;
Children ;
Dose-response relationships ;
Point sources ;
Air pollution sampling
|
Internet Access |
|
Holdings |
Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last Modified |
Checkout Status |
EHAM |
EPA-450/2-89-022 |
|
Region 1 Library/Boston,MA |
05/25/2016 |
EKBD |
EPA-450/2-89-022 |
|
Research Triangle Park Library/RTP, NC |
08/20/1993 |
ELBD ARCHIVE |
EPA 450-2-89-022 |
Received from HQ |
AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH |
10/04/2023 |
ERAD |
EPA 450/2-89-022 |
|
Region 9 Library/San Francisco,CA |
11/16/1991 |
ESAD |
EPA 450-2-89-022 |
|
Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA |
03/23/2010 |
NTIS |
PB91-206185 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
Collation |
1 volume (various pagings) |
Abstract |
The paper evaluates and interprets the updated scientific and technical information that EPA staff believes is most relevant to the review of the primary (health) and secondary (welfare) national ambient air quality standards for lead. The assessment is intended to bridge the gap between the scientific review in the EPA criteria document and the judgements required of the Administrator in setting the ambient air quality standards for lead. The major recommendations of the staff paper are: (1) the range of standards under consideration should be from 0.5 to 1.5 microg/cu m; (2) a monthly averaging period would better reflect children's responsiveness to lead exposures than a quarterly averaging period; (3) the most appropriate form of the standard is the second highest monthly average in a 3 year span; (4) with a monthly averaging period, more frequent sampling is needed in areas with point sources; and (5) the hi-volume sampler should be retained to monitor compliance with the lead NAAQS. |
Notes |
"December 1990." "OAQPS staff paper." "Air Quality Management Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards." |