Main Title |
Conoco dolomite hot gas cleanup system / |
Author |
Oliver, Earl Davis,
|
Other Authors |
|
CORP Author |
Stanford Research Inst., Menlo Park, Calif.;Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Office of Energy, Minerals and Industry. |
Publisher |
Office of Research and Development, Office of Energy, Minerals and Industry, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ; available through the National Technical Information Service, |
Year Published |
1976 |
Report Number |
EPA-600/2-76-084; SRI-3570-24; EPA-68-01-2940; SRI-ECU-3570 |
Stock Number |
PB-272 434 |
OCLC Number |
02623342 |
Subjects |
Desulphurization
|
Additional Subjects |
Air pollution control ;
Sulfur ;
Pilot plants ;
Technology ;
Feasibility ;
Economics ;
Cost analysis ;
Coal gasification ;
Particles ;
Process charting ;
Industrial wastes ;
Combustion products ;
Forecasting ;
Comparison ;
Performance evaluation ;
Efficiency ;
Conoco dolomite systems ;
High sulfur coal
|
Internet Access |
|
Holdings |
Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last Modified |
Checkout Status |
EJBD |
EPA 600-2-76-084 |
c.1 |
Headquarters Library/Washington,DC |
02/24/2014 |
EKBD |
EPA-600/2-76-084 |
|
Research Triangle Park Library/RTP, NC |
06/20/2003 |
ELBD ARCHIVE |
EPA 600-2-76-084 |
Received from HQ |
AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH |
10/04/2023 |
ESAD |
EPA 600-2-76-084 |
|
Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA |
03/23/2010 |
NTIS |
PB-272 434 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
Collation |
vii, 56 p. : ill. ; 29 cm. |
Abstract |
This report analyzes a proposal that EPA sponsor a large-scale pilot plant to develop the Conoco (formerly Consol) Dolomite Hot Gas Clean-up system. The report includes a history of the prior development program, the technology involved comparisons with competitive technologies in regard to technical feasibility, potential efficiency, and environmental benefits. Future funding implications are explored. The potential benefits in economy and efficiency of energy conversion are judged to be substantial, but the cost of development is high. The expected cost of the pilot plant program may be greater than funding ability. The current laboratory program should either be continued or should be terminated in a way that will insure that the knowledge already gained is retrievable. |