Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 14 OF 21

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Field Test of a Generic Method for the Sampling and Analysis of Halogenated Hydrocarbons Listed in Title III of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.
Author McGaughey, J. F. ; Bursey, J. T. ; Rice, J. ; Merrill, R. G. ; Jackson, M. D. ;
CORP Author Radian Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC.;Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Lab.
Publisher 1993
Year Published 1993
Report Number EPA-68-D1-0010; EPA/600/A-94/094;
Stock Number PB94-176617
Additional Subjects Air pollution sampling ; Chemical analysis ; Halogenated hydrocarbons ; Field tests ; Emission factors ; Statistical analysis ; Analytical techniques ; Design criteria ; Test methods ; Sample preparation ; Precision ; Validation ; Bias ; Quality assurance ; Stack gases ; Fossil-fuel power plants ; Reprints ; EPA Method 301 ; VOST(Volatile Organic Sampling Train) ; Volatile organic compounds ; Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
NTIS  PB94-176617 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. 09/01/1994
Collation 14p
Abstract
To validate a new source test method for EPA use, the performance of the sampling and analytical methodology for the chemicals of interest must be established and demonstrated through field tests at sources similar to those of interest. Validation studies for measuring volatile and semi-volatile halogenated organics were undertaken in two different studies. Repeated sampling runs of the Volatile Organic Sample Train (VOST; SW-846 Sampling Method 0030 with Analytical Method 5041) and Semi-Volatile Organic Sample Train (Semi-VOST; SW-846 Method 0010 with Analytical Method 8270) were collected at two source locations. Quadruple sampling trains were used in each run, with two of the trains being spiked with standards. For the VOST method, the results of the two field studies were consistent with laboratory tests. For the Semi-VOST method, consistent results were obtained in the laboratory study and one of the field tests. At the second field site, the Semi-VOST data were inadequate because of problems encountered in preparation of the samples for analysis.