Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 31 OF 86

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Economic impact of implementing RACT guidelines in the state of Tennessee.
CORP Author Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Florham Park, NJ. Foster D. Snell Div.;Environmental Protection Agency, Atlanta, GA. Air and Hazardous Materials Div.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, Air Programs Branch,
Year Published 1979
Report Number EPA 904/9-79-036; EPA-68-02-2544
Stock Number PB-297 288
OCLC Number 31275260
Subjects Air quality--Economic aspects--Tennessee ; Air--Pollution--Economic aspects--Tennessee
Additional Subjects Air pollution ; Economic impact ; Industrial wastes ; Guidelines ; State government ; Regulations ; Hydrocarbons ; Coatings ; Metal cleaning ; Gasoline ; Refineries ; Storage tanks ; Petroleum products ; Asphalt ; Papers ; Textiles ; Automobiles ; Furniture ; Insulation ; Degreasing ; Tennessee ; Air pollution abatement ; Fugitive emissions ; Service stations ; EPA Region 4
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EKAM  EPA 904/9-79-036 Region 4 Library/Atlanta,GA 10/14/1994
NTIS  PB-297 288 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 01/01/1988
Collation 1 v. (various pagings) ; 28 cm.
Abstract
The major objective of the contract effort was to determine the direct economic impact of implementing RACT standards in Tennessee. The study is to be used primarily to assist EPA and state decisions on achieving the emission limitations of the RACT standards. The economic impact was assessed for the following 13 RACT industrial categories: surface coatings (cans, coils, paper, fabrics, metal furniture, large appliances); solvent metal cleaning; bulk gasoline terminals; refinery systems; bulk gasoline plants; storage of petroleum liquids in fixed roof tanks; gasoline dispensing stations--Stage I; and use of cutback asphalt. The scope of this project was to determine the costs and direct impact of control to achieve RACT guideline limitations for these 13 industry categories in Tennessee. Direct economic costs and benefits from the implementation of RACT limitations were identified and quantified while secondary impacts (energy, employment, etc.) are addressed, they were not a major emphasis in the study.
Notes
Prepared by Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc. "EPA 904/9-79-036." "April, 1979".