Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 67 OF 72

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title VOC Prevention Options for Surface Coating.
Author McMinn, B. W. ; Newman, C. R. ; McCrillis, R. C. ; Kosusko, M. ;
CORP Author Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Air and Energy Engineering Research Lab. ;Alliance Technologies Corp., Chapel Hill, NC. ;Science Applications International Corp., Durham, NC.
Publisher 1991
Year Published 1991
Report Number EPA/600/A-92/146;
Stock Number PB92-198266
Additional Subjects Volatile organic compounds ; Air pollution abatement ; Surface coating ; Stationary sources ; Solvents ; Environmental chemical substitutes ; Revisions ; Substitutes ; Technology utilization ; Process charting ; Equipment ; Coating processes ; Design criteria ; Small systems
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
NTIS  PB92-198266 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 06/01/1993
Collation 17p
Abstract
The paper discusses some of the volatile organic compound (VOC) prevention options for surface coating. Most small surface coating industries are considered to be stationary area sources. Although stationary area sources may account for as much as 50% of national VOC emissions, they are often not amenable to add-on controls because of cost and the difficulty in capturing emissions. Pollution prevention techniques, such as product substitutions, process modifications, alternative technologies, and improved housekeeping, are needed to reduce VOC emissions from coating operations, thereby aiding in attaining the ozone standard and in decreasing exposure to air toxics. Some currently used products which may be alternatives to traditional solvent-based coatings include powder, waterborne, radiation-curable, and high-solids coatings. Many coating facilities have also reduced VOC emissions by converting conventional spray, airless, or air-assisted airless equipment to electrostatic or high-volume low-pressure units. In addition, several existing technologies that combine the benefits of both process modifications and product substitutions are discussed.