||Cost of alternative flue gas desulfurization (FGD) sludge disposal regulations
Woodyard, John P. ;
Rishel, Howard L.
||SCS Engineers, Inc., Long Beach, CA.;Municipal Environmental Research Lab., Cincinnati, OH.
||National Technical Information Service,
Steam power-plants--Waste disposal--Economic aspects ;
Air--Pollution--Law and legislation--Economic aspects ;
Flue gases--Desulphurization--Waste disposal ;
Flue gases--Desulphurization--Economic aspects
Sludge disposal ;
Electric power plants ;
Cost analysis ;
Flue gases ;
National government ;
Air pollution control ;
State government ;
Water pollution control ;
Combustion products ;
Industrial wastes ;
Stationary sources ;
Flue gas desulfurization
||Region 4 Library/Atlanta,GA
||Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy.
||xv, 118 p. ; 28 cm.
In this report, the state of FGD acceptance in the utility industry is described. The various sludge treatment and disposal options are then delineated. Current federal and state regulations affecting FGD disposal are discussed, and then placed in a conceptual framework from which regulatory scenarios are developed. The scenarios are then applied to the current (1980) and projected (1985) FGD capacity to estimate what changes, if any, would need to be made in current utility operations to achieve compliance. Using the best available cost data base for these disposal alternatives, region-specific cost estimates are developed for 10 model power plants for each of five disposal options. Applying each regulatory scenario, the cost impact on the utility industry is then estimated for the 50 different situations.
PB-81118895. November 1980. Original : Cincinnati, Ohio : Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory, 1980. Bibliography : p. 115-118.