Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 601 OF 1672

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Evaluation of the U.S. Geological Survey Laboratory, Denver, Colorado /
Author Booth, Robert L.,
CORP Author Environmental Monitoring and Support Lab.-Cincinnati, Ohio.
Publisher Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory,
Year Published 1978
Report Number EPA-600/7-78-083
Stock Number PB-285 595
OCLC Number 04617295
ISBN pbk.
Additional Subjects Geological Survey (U.S.) ; Laboratories ; Water analysis ; Quality assurance ; Accuracy ; Sampling ; National government ; Water pollution ; Colorado ; Monitoring ; Geological Survey Laboratory ; Environmental Protection Agency ; Water pollution detection
Internet Access
Description Access URL
http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=9101YBP9.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EJBD ARCHIVE EPA 600-7-78-083 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 07/18/2011
EJBD  EPA 600-7-78-083 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 10/23/2014
EKAM  EPA-600/7-78-083 Region 4 Library/Atlanta,GA 07/08/1994
ESAD  EPA 600-7-78-083 Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA 03/23/2010
NTIS  PB-285 595 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 06/23/1988
Collation v, 12 pages ; 28 cm.
Abstract
An onsite evaluation was made of the capabilities of the U.S. Geological Survey Laboratory at Denver, Colorado. Particular emphasis was placed on determining their ability to meet the monitoring requirements connected with their contractual efforts with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This monitoring is a major part of the Environmental Protection Agency's quality assurance program in support of energy-related activities in the western United States. Overall, water analyses for parameters related to the broad areas of chemistry, organics and pesticides, and radiochemistry are being conducted by approved sampling/preservation techniques and laboratory methods. Results on unknown performance samples and cross-check samples were well within acceptable ranges, thus documenting their ability to generate valid data. Specific recommendations for areas of improvement are given.
Notes
"May 1978."