Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 43 OF 121

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Dynamic Spiking Studies Using the DNPH Sampling Train.
Author Steger, J. L. ; Knoll, J. E. ;
CORP Author Radian Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC.;Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. National Exposure Research Lab.
Publisher 1996
Year Published 1996
Report Number EPA-68-D4-0022; EPA/600/A-96/085;
Stock Number PB97-122873
Additional Subjects Air pollution sampling ; Aldehydes ; Ketones ; Hydrazines ; Sample preparation ; Analytical methods ; Test methods ; Accuracy ; Precision ; Reproducibility ; Laboratory tests ; Field tests ; Statistical analysis ; DNPH(2-4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine) ; 2-4-Dinitrohenylhydrazine ; EPA Method 301 ; Spiking
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=P100TXN3.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
NTIS  PB97-122873 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. 02/22/1997
Collation 13p
Abstract
The proposed aldehyde and ketone sampling method using aqueous 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) was evaluated in the laboratory and in the field. The sampling trains studied were based on the train described in SW 846 Method 0011. Nine compounds were evaluated: formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, quinone, acrolein, propionaldeyde, methyl isobutyl ketone, methyl ethyl ketone, acetophenone, and isophorone. In the laboratory, the trains were spiked both statistically and dynamically. Laboratory studies also investigated potential interferences to the method. Based on their potential to hydrolyze in acid solution to form formaldehyde, dimethylolurea, saligenin, s-trioxane, hexamethylenetetramine, and paraformaldehyde were investigated. Ten runs were performed using quadruplicate sampling trains. Two of the four trains were dynamically spiked with the nine aldehydes and ketones. The test results were evaluated using the EPA method 301 criteria for method precision (< + pr - 50% relative standard deviation) and bias (correction factor of 1.00 + or - 0.30).