Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 34 OF 57

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Interim procedures for evaluating air quality models (revised) /
CORP Author Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Monitoring and Data Analysis Div.
Publisher The Office,
Year Published 1984
Report Number EPA-450/4-84-023
Stock Number PB85-106060
OCLC Number 11881446
Subjects Air--Pollution--United States. ; Air--Pollution--United States--Mathematical models.
Additional Subjects Air pollution ; Mathematical models ; Performance evaluation ; Standards ; Comparison ; Air quality ; Procedures
Internet Access
Description Access URL
http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=2000N5D7.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EJAD  EPA 450/4-84-023 Region 3 Library/Philadelphia, PA 01/07/1994
EJBD ARCHIVE 450-4-84-023 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 06/12/2013
EKAM  EPA-450/4-84-023 Region 4 Library/Atlanta,GA 12/31/1998
EKBD  EPA-450/4-84-023 Research Triangle Park Library/RTP, NC 07/27/2001
ESAD  EPA-450-4-84-023 Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA 09/10/1999
NTIS  PB85-106060 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 01/01/1988
Collation 1 v. (various pagings) : ill. ; 28 cm.
Abstract
This document describes interim procedures for use in accepting, for a specific regulatory application, a model that is not recommended in the Guideline on Air Quality Models. The procedure involves a technical evaluation and a performance evaluation, utilizing measured ambient data, of the proposed nonguideline model. The primary basis for accepting the proposed model is a demonstration that it performs better (better agreement with measured data) that the guideline model or the model that EPA would normally use in the given situation. The acceptance procedure may also consider the technical merits of the proposed model and, especially in cases where an EPA recommended model cannot be identified, the performance of the model in comparison to a set of specially designed performance standards. A major component of the procedure is the development of a protocol which describes exactly how the performance evaluation will be conducted and what the specific basis for accepting or rejecting the proposed model will be.
Notes
"September 1984." Distributed to depository libraries in microfiche. Includes bibliographical references.