Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 43 OF 130

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Evaluation of a Personal Nephelometer for Human Exposure Monitoring.
Author Rea, A. W. ; Martin, R. ; Mitchell, W. J. ;
CORP Author Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. National Exposure Research Lab.
Publisher 31 Aug 2000
Year Published 2000
Report Number EPA/600/A-00119;
Stock Number PB2001-102833
Additional Subjects Nephelometers ; Air pollution monitoring ; Particulate matter ; Human exposure ; Evaluation ; Exposure monitoring ; Humidity ; Light scattering ; Adverse effect ; Personal devices
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=P100TDX4.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
NTIS  PB2001-102833 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. 10/17/2002
Collation 14p
Abstract
Current particulate matter (PM) exposure studies are using continuous personal nephelometers (pDR-1000, MIE, Inc.) to measure human exposure to PM. The personal nephelometer is a passive sampler which uses light scattering technology to measure particles ranging in size from 0.1-10 micrometers using a light scattering technique, however, it is more responsive to particles in the fine particle size range (0.3-3 micrometers). While the data from the nephelometer remain semi-quantitative, the instrument is very useful for identifying activities and microenvironments that may significantly enhance human exposure to PM. Based on the use of this instrument in the field, the authors recognize that it is important to identify activities or environments that may have an adverse effect on the instrument's response and subsequent data quality. The authors have tested the nephelometers response to sample vest fabric (cotton/polyester or nylon), sampler location on an individual (shoulder vs. waist), and relative humidity. Repeated scripted activities while wearing a 50-50 cotton/polyester or a nylon vest indicated that significantly more particles (p < 0.01) were introduced by the cotton/polyester vest than the nylon vest. The location of the monitor was weakly significantly different (p < 0.1) for many common activities, and significantly higher particle readings were observed at the waist (p < 0.02) while sweeping.