Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 47 OF 72

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Omega-1 lidar : data analysis report, Columbus and Souther Ohio Electric Company Conesville generating station, Conesville, Ohio.
Publisher National Enforcement Investigations Center,
Year Published 1980
Report Number EPA-330/1-80-004
OCLC Number 895043609
Subjects Air--Pollution--Measurement. ; Optical radar.
Additional Subjects Columbus and Southern Ohio Electric Company.
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=9101X2E5.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EJBD ARCHIVE EPA 330-1-80-004 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 11/17/2014
EJBD  EPA 330-1-80-004 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 11/17/2014
ELBD RPS EPA 330-1-80-004 repository copy AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 01/25/2016
ELBD  EPA 330-1-80-004 AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 02/02/2016
Collation [62] leaves : map, charts ; 28 cm.
Contents Notes
I. Introduction -- II. Summary and conclusions -- III. Methods -- IV. Data analysis presentation The opacity of visible emissions from the three operating stationary sources within the Conesville Generating Station, Columbus and Southern Ohio Electric Company (C&SOE), Conesville, Ohio, was measured during the late afternoon on June 9, 1980, and during morning and later afternoon on June 10, 1980. The sources investigated were Stacks 1, 2, and 4. All measurements were conducted remotely from off the plant site. Opacities were measured remotely with the NEIC Omega-1 Lidar which is a new instrumentation method. This method has been proposed in the Federal Register as Alternate method 1 to Reference Method 9. Nine sets of opacity measurements were made, the total of which was about 1,225 individual measurements made over a total observation time of about 3 hours. The measurement sets varied in length from 11 to 30 minutes. Individual measurements were made approximately once about every 9 seconds. All opacity measurements were subsequently analyzed and reduced using the NEIC laboratory computer according to the methods given in Alternate Method 1 (proposed).