Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 240 OF 297

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Review of the national ambient air quality standards for lead : assessment of scientific and technical information : OAQPS staff report.
Author Cohen, J. ; Brion, G. ; Haines., J.
CORP Author Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ; Available from the National Technical Information Service,
Year Published 1990
Report Number EPA-450/2-89-022
Stock Number PB91-206185
OCLC Number 34428644
Subjects Air quality--Standards.
Additional Subjects Lead(Metal) ; Air pollution effects(Humans) ; Public health ; National Ambient Air Quality Standards ; Risk assessment ; Reviews ; Air pollution standards ; Technology transfer ; Exposure ; Biological effects ; Ecosystems ; Toxicity ; Standards compliance ; Children ; Dose-response relationships ; Point sources ; Air pollution sampling
Internet Access
Description Access URL
http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=2000K8RL.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
NTIS  PB91-206185 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 01/01/1988
Collation 200 pages : illustrations ; 28 cm
Abstract
The paper evaluates and interprets the updated scientific and technical information that EPA staff believes is most relevant to the review of the primary (health) and secondary (welfare) national ambient air quality standards for lead. The assessment is intended to bridge the gap between the scientific review in the EPA criteria document and the judgements required of the Administrator in setting the ambient air quality standards for lead. The major recommendations of the staff paper are: (1) the range of standards under consideration should be from 0.5 to 1.5 microg/cu m; (2) a monthly averaging period would better reflect children's responsiveness to lead exposures than a quarterly averaging period; (3) the most appropriate form of the standard is the second highest monthly average in a 3 year span; (4) with a monthly averaging period, more frequent sampling is needed in areas with point sources; and (5) the hi-volume sampler should be retained to monitor compliance with the lead NAAQS.
Notes
"EPA-450/2-89-022." "December 1990." "PB91-206185." Includes bibliographical references. Microfiche.