Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 5 OF 8

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Revenue producing systems in selected air pollution control agencies : (short title, fee study) : final report /
Author Gruber, C. W.
CORP Author Cincinnati Univ., Ohio.;Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, N.C. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Publisher C.W. Gruber,
Year Published 1974
Report Number EPA 450/3-75-018; EPA-68-02-1454
Stock Number PB-239 503
OCLC Number 04122863
Subjects Air--Pollution--United States. ; Air--Pollution--Economic aspects. ; Air quality management--Costs.
Additional Subjects Public administration ; Fees ; State planning ; Local government activities ; Municipalities ; Reviews ; Management guidelines ; Information ; Revenue ; Air pollution ; Effectiveness ; Constraining ; Data acquisition ; Interviews ; Air pollution abatement
Internet Access
Description Access URL
http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=9101021O.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EJAD  EPA 450/3-75-018 Region 3 Library/Philadelphia, PA 09/30/1994
EKBD  EPA-450/3-75-018 Research Triangle Park Library/RTP, NC 08/27/1999
ERAD  EPA 450/3-75-018 Region 9 Library/San Francisco,CA 08/06/2012
ESAD  EPA 450-3-75-018 Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA 03/23/2010
NTIS  PB-239 503 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 01/01/1988
Collation iv, 73 leaves ; 28 cm.
Abstract
This paper reports the findings of a study of finance systems in nine air pollution control agencies for producing revenue. These revenue producing systems include various permit fees, inspection fees, monitoring/surveillance fees, and specially earmarked taxes. The agencies studied included two State agencies (Oregon and Wisconsin) and seven local agencies (St. Louis, Philadelphia, Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco Bay Area, and Puget Sound). The study found that collecting fees usually presented few problems except where fees were levied against other public entities (e.g., schools, government buildings). It also concluded that fees alone are not major enforcement aids.