Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 19 OF 24

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Report of the Arsenic Cost Working Group to the National Drinking Water Advisory Council final. {microform} :
CORP Author National Drinking Water Advisory Council (U.S.). Arsenic Cost Working Group.
Publisher U.S.E.P.A. Office of Water,
Year Published 2001
Stock Number PB2001-107996
Subjects Drinking water--Arsenic content--United States ; Drinking water--Law and legislation--Compliance costs--United States
Additional Subjects Arsenic ; Drinking water ; Cost estimates ; Costing methodologies ; Recommendations ; Implementation ; Arsenic Cost Working Group ; Supporting information ; Arsenic in Drinking Water Rule
Internet Access
Description Access URL
http://www.epa.gov/safewater/ars/ndwac-arsenic-report.pdf
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
NTIS  PB2001-107996 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 01/01/1988
Abstract
The Arsenic Cost Working Group of the National Drinking Water Advisory Council has completed its analysis for the cost of implementation of the arsenic rule. This report includes the group's findings and recommendations. The charge of the National Drinking Water Advisory Council (NDWAC) Arsenic Cost Working Group was to review the costing methodologies, assumptions, and information underlying the system-size cost estimates as well as the aggregated national estimate of system costs of the Arsenic in Drinking Water Rule. As part of this review, the working group was to evaluate alternative costing approaches or critiques that may have a significant impact on the estimated system costs. In making this evaluation, the working group was charged to determine whether there is adequate supporting information upon which to evaluate the basis for the alternate approaches or critiques and note where there is not adequate supporting information. The final element of the working group's charge was to develop, based on its review and analysis, a written recommendation to the NDWAC. Such recommendations are to be provided with the understanding that EPA will decide whether and how any revision of the arsenic rule's cost analysis will occur.
Notes
Title from first p. of document. "August 14, 2001." Includes bibliographical references. Microfiche.