Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 18 OF 144

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Comprehensive abatement performance pilot study /
Author Buxton, B. ; Rust, S. ; Kinateder, J. ; Burgoon, D. ; Todt, F.
CORP Author Battelle Memorial Inst., Columbus, OH. ;Midwest Research Inst., Kansas City, MO.;Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Pollution, Prevention, and Toxics.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Year Published 1995
Report Number EPA 747-R-93-007; EPA-68-D2-0139
Stock Number PB96-191200
OCLC Number 33058409
Subjects Lead abatement. ; Lead based paint--Removal.
Additional Subjects Pollution abatement ; Sampling ; Ecological concentration ; Environmental exposure pathway ; Dust ; Soil contamination ; Lead(Metal) ; Chemical analysis ; Collecting methods ; Sample preparation ; Absorption spectroscopy ; Protocols ; Interlaboratory comparisons ; Remediation ; Statistical analysis ; Data management ; Lead paint ; Atomic absorption
Internet Access
Description Access URL
http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=20012QQ7.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EJBD ARCHIVE EPA 747-R-93-007 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 09/26/2011
EJED  EPA 747-R-93-007 OCSPP Chemical Library/Washington,DC 08/10/2001
EKAD  EPA 747-R-93-007 Region 4 Library/Atlanta,GA 06/07/2002
ELBD RPS EPA 747-R-93-007 repository copy AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 10/17/2014
NTIS  PB96-191200 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 01/01/1988
Collation 2 v. ; 28 cm.
Abstract
This report presents the results from the pilot study that preceded the Comprehensive Abatement Performance Study. The major finding of the pilot was the difference between wipe and vacuum methods for collecting dust. The choice of method had a noticeable impact on the level of lead associated with the collected sample. An interlaboratory comparison of dust and soil samples indicated no systematic difference in lead levels between the two laboratories. In addition, intra-laboratory comparisons of sample results by inductively coupled plasma-atomic absorption spectrometry (ICP) and the more sensitive graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAA) indicated good agreement within the common domain of instrument detection limits. Other important findings from the pilot study were results related to variance components.
Notes
"February 1995"--Cover, v. 1. "EPA 747-R-93-007"--Cover, v. 1.
Contents Notes
v. 1. Results of lead data analysis.