Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 2 OF 2

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Evaluation of fluidic combined sewer regulators under muncipial service conditions /
Author Freeman, Peter A.
CORP Author Philadelphia Water Dept., Pa. ;Freeman (Peter A.) Associates, Inc., Berlin, Md.;Municipal Environmental Research Lab., Edison, N.J. Storm and Combined Sewer Section.
Publisher Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory ; For sale by the National Technical Information Service,
Year Published 1977
Report Number EPA-600/2-77-071; EPA-11022-FWR
Stock Number PB-272 273
OCLC Number 03388237
ISBN pbk.
Subjects Combined sewers--Pennsylvania--Philadelphia. ; Fluidic devices.
Additional Subjects Fluid flow ; Regulators ; Combined sewers ; Municipalities ; Performance evaluation ; Fluidic control devices ; Fluid infiltration ; Cost effectiveness ; Hydraulic gates ; Maintenance ; Overflows ; Efficiency ; Pennsylvania ; Fluidic regulators ; Philadelphia(Pennsylvania)
Internet Access
Description Access URL
http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=300004FT.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EJAD  EPA 600/2-77-071 Region 3 Library/Philadelphia, PA 06/02/2000
EJBD ARCHIVE EPA 600-2-77-071 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 01/11/2011
EJBD  EPA 600-2-77-071 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 09/11/2014
ELBD  EPA 600-2-77-071 AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 12/19/1997
ERAD  EPA 600/2-77-071 Region 9 Library/San Francisco,CA 09/17/2012
ESAD  EPA 600-2-77-071 Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA 03/23/2010
NTIS  PB-272 273 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 01/01/1988
Collation ix, 95 pages : illustrations, diagrams, map ; 28 cm.
Abstract
This report describes the evaluation of two fluidic combined sewer regulators operated by the city of Philadelphia Water Department under typical municipal service conditions. The smaller unit provided much better hydraulic regulation performance than the conventional static regulator it replaced, approaching that of a complex, dynamic regulator. The larger unit demonstrated a similar performance potential which was not practicably achieved because of unforeseen, heavy infiltration in the connecting sewer. Considering both hydraulic performance and costs, the fluidic regulator was considered to offer greater cost effectiveness than either conventional static or dynamic combined sewer regulators.
Notes
Prepared by Peter A. Freeman Associates, Inc., Berlin, Md., under grant no. 11022 FWR. Includes appendices. Issued August 1977. Includes bibliographical references (page 72).