Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog


OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title PROJECT Model: Evaluates the Value of Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEP), Version 1.1 (for Microcomputers).
CORP Author Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Enforcement.
Publisher Dec 94
Year Published 1994
Stock Number PB95-502548
Additional Subjects Software ; Superfund ; Hazardous materials ; Waste management ; Pollution regulations ; Law enforcement ; Liabilities ; Violations ; Fines(Charges) ; Penalties ; Payments ; Pollution control ; Pollution abatement ; Remedial action ; Government policies ; Diskettes ; PROJECT computer model ; Supplemental environmental projects ; Settlements ; Potentially responsible parties
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
NTIS  PB95-502548 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 05/26/1995
Collation 1 diskette
PROJECT was developed to assist EPA's enforcement program in its penalty assessment responsibilities. The PROJECT Model evaluates the after-tax, net present value of supplemental environmental project (SEP). Violators propose SEP's to mitigate their penalty liability. SEP's are appearing with increasing frequency in enforcement negotiations. In addition, SEP's allow the Agency to effect some extra environmental improvement. The model allows personnel without any background in accounting or corporate finance to determine the real cost of a SEP to defendant for settlement purposes. It prompts the user for costs, dates and certain interest and tax rates. It then calculates the actual cost of a SEP to a defendant by reducing the costs of the project to reflect its tax consequences and net-present value. Projected users of this model are the citizen environmental groups, attorneys representing defendants in enforcement actions, and corporate officials with enmvironmental responsibilities. The software will allow them to easily evaluate proposed SEP's in the same way the EPA evaluates them. This provides clearer communication among parties involved in compliance issues.