Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 22 OF 2231

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title A review of environmental impact assessment methodologies /
Author Warner, Maurice L.,
Other Authors
Author Title of a Work
Preston, Edward Henry,
Kibby, Harold V.
CORP Author Battelle Columbus Labs., Ohio.;Office of Water Research Technology, Washington, D.C.;Washington Environmental Research Center, D.C. Implementation Research Div.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development,
Year Published 1974
Report Number EPA-600/5-74-002; EPA-68-01-1871; W75-00013
Stock Number PB-236 609
OCLC Number 01063115
Subjects Pollution--Measurement. ; Environmental policy.
Additional Subjects Environmental surveys ; Assessments ; Reviews ; Methodology ; Evaluation ; Environmental impacts ; Environmental impact statements
Internet Access
Description Access URL
http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=9101BOX1.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EIAD  EPA-600/5-74-002 Region 2 Library/New York,NY 08/30/1997 DISPERSAL
EJAD  EPA 600/5-74-002 Region 3 Library/Philadelphia, PA 03/01/1996
EJBD ARCHIVE EPA 600-5-74-002 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 02/07/2014
EJBD  EPA 600-5-74-002 c.1-2 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 05/05/2014
EKBD  EPA-600/5-74-002 Research Triangle Park Library/RTP, NC 09/12/2003
ELBD  EPA 600-5-74-002 AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 02/27/2018
ELDD  EPA-600/5-74-002 NHEERL/MED Library/Duluth,MN 04/05/2006
NTIS  PB-236 609 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 01/01/1988
Collation vi, 27 pages ; 27 cm.
Abstract
Seventeen tools or methodologies designed for or applicable to the preparation of environmental impact statements are reviewed to identify their strengths, weaknesses, and potential range of use. Specific criteria are suggested for evaluating the adequacy of an impact assessment methodology in terms of: impact identification, impact measurement, impact interpretation, impact communication, resource requirements, replicability, and, flexibility. The reviews presented serve as an introduction to the range of tools available and demonstrate that no single approach to impact assessment is superior in all circumstances.
Notes
"April 1974." "Contract No. 68-01-1871." "Project Officer Harold V. Kibby, Implementation Research Division, Washington Environmental Research Center." Includes bibliographical references (pages 25-26).