Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 11 OF 28

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Evaluation of community-based environmental protection projects : accomplishmnets and lessons learned.
CORP Author Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Policy, Economics, and Innovation.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy Economics and Innovation,
Year Published 2003
Report Number EPA 100-R-02-004
Stock Number PB2012-107938
OCLC Number 883633916
Subjects Community development--United States--Case studies. ; Environmental management--United States. ; Environmental protection--Cost effectiveness.
Additional Subjects Environmental protection ; Community planning ; Sustainable development ; Colorado ; South Carolina ; Florida ; Pennsylvania ; Missouri ; Case studies ; San Miguel River(Colorado) ; York(Pennsylvania) ; St Louis(Missouri) ; Charleston(South Carolina)
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=P1001BL9.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EJBD ARCHIVE EPA 100-R-02-004 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 07/21/2014
NTIS  PB2012-107938 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. 10/24/2012
Collation 74 pages ; 28 cm
Abstract
The purpose of this report is to evaluate a set of regional CBEP projects in which EPA participates.The evaluation considers both environmental outcomes of each of the projects as well as the overall effectiveness of the CBEP process. Specifically, the evaluation focuses on a set of key questions: To what extent have the selected CBEP projects provided measurable environmental results related to EPAfs strategic goals as well as improvements in the long-term sustainability of communities. Alternatively, how have the CBEP projects helped to lay the groundwork for environmental and sustainability improvements. Which CBEP attributes are prominent in the selected projects. Overall, how are these important in making the projects work well. What factors affect projects that do not work as well. What was the value added of the CBEP approach for EPAfs community partners and for the Agency itself. For example, does CBEP help foster an enduring community process focused on natural resource management and environmental quality (i.e., a stewardship role).
Notes
"EPA 100-R-02-004." "March 2003.