Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 250 OF 258

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title User's Guide: Fugitive Dust Control Demonstration Studies.
Author Beggs, T. W. ;
CORP Author JACA Corp., Fort Washington, PA.;Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Center for Environmental Research Information.
Year Published 1985
Report Number EPA-68-03-3132; EPA/600/8-84/032;
Stock Number PB85-165793
Additional Subjects Dust control ; Guidelines ; Air pollution control ; Particles ; State government ; Sources ; Substitutes ; Industrial wastes ; Combustion products ; Performance evaluation ; Fugitive emissions ; Bubble concept ; Emission factors ; Clean Air Act ; Case studies
Internet Access
Description Access URL
http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=30001EOR.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
NTIS  PB85-165793 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 06/21/1988
Collation 36p
Abstract
Under certain circumstances, sources of air pollution may be able to meet their obligations under the Clean Air Act by the use of the bubble concept. State and local agency officials are responsible for determining the validity of bubble proposals. Thus, these officials must be in a position to determine if claimed reductions in fugitive emissions from such sources as roadways and storage piles can be substantiated for the control methods proposed. There are many studies available to the official that discuss the effectiveness of various control techniques for nontraditional particulate emissions. This User's Guide provides state and local agency officials and those responsible for conducting fugitive particulate demonstration studies insight into the validity of recent studies. It also stresses the considerations of importance when planning this type of study. From the data presently available, it was not possible to develop quantitative emission factors of control efficiencies for the various control alternatives.