Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 467 OF 1175

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Fluoride: Dose-Response Analysis For Non-Cancer Effects. Dental Fluorosis: Evaluations of Key Studies.
Author J. M. Donohue
CORP Author Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Water.
Year Published 2008
Report Number EPA 820-R-10-018
Stock Number PB2011-104802
Additional Subjects Fluorides ; Dosage ; Drinking water ; Food ; Exposure ; Bones ; Analytical methods ; Biological effects ; Public health ; Toxicology ; Statistical data ; Surveys
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=P100N4KD.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
NTIS  PB2011-104802 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 07/20/2011
Collation 72p
Abstract
Prior to initiating the dose-response analysis for fluoride-related skeletal effects, the Office of Water (OW) critically evaluated the studies that had been cited and utilized by the National Research Council (NRC, 2006) in their report Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Scientific Review of EPA's Standards. Additional studies identified in the OW initial literature search (2006) were also evaluated. This document is a compilation of the study evaluations arranged alphabetically by the name of the lead author. Critical information fields examined and summarized include endpoint studied, type of study and population studied, exposure period and assessment, characterization of study groups, analytical methods and study design, parameters monitored, statistical methods employed, results (including critical tables and figures) authors' conclusions, critical references and definitions, profilers appraisal, and critical review of the profiler's assessment. Studies of fluoride-related skeletal effects identified and added to the dose-response analysis for the non-cancer effects document after its external peer review were not evaluated in this fashion.