| Main Title |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of proposed effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the metal products and machinery industry (phase 1) / |
| Author |
Tudor, Lynne G.
|
| CORP Author |
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Science and Technology. |
| Publisher |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Science and Technology, Engineering and Analysis Division, |
| Year Published |
1995 |
| Report Number |
EPA 821-R-95-025 |
| Stock Number |
PB95-219945 |
| OCLC Number |
32647724 |
| Subjects |
Effluent quality--Standards--Cost effectiveness ;
Metal products--Making--Environmental aspects--Cost effectiveness ;
Machinery industry--Environmental aspects--Cost effectiveness
|
| Additional Subjects |
Cost effectiveness ;
Water pollution control ;
Chemical effluents ;
Metal industry ;
Metal products ;
Machinery ;
Water pollutants ;
Water pollution economics ;
Economic impact ;
Cost benefit analysis ;
Costs ;
Market analysis ;
Waste water ;
Point sources ;
Nonpoint sources ;
Discharge(Water) ;
Pretreatment ;
Water pollution standards ;
Standards compliance ;
Requirements ;
Pollution regulations ;
Weighting functions ;
Alternatives ;
Guidelines
|
| Internet Access |
|
| Holdings |
| Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last
Modified |
Checkout
Status |
| EJAD |
EPA 821/R-95-025 |
|
Region 3 Library/Philadelphia, PA |
07/21/1995 |
| EJBD |
EPA 821-R-95-025 |
|
Headquarters Library/Washington,DC |
01/09/2014 |
| ELBD ARCHIVE |
EPA 821-R-95-025 |
Received from HQ |
AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH |
10/04/2023 |
| ELBD |
EPA 821-R-95-025 |
|
AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH |
10/12/2010 |
| NTIS |
PB95-219945 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
| Collation |
1 v. (various pagings) ; 28 cm. |
| Abstract |
This cost-effectiveness analysis supports the proposed effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the Metal Products and Machinery Industry (MP and M) Phase I Industry. The report assesses the cost-effectiveness of five regulatory options for indirect dischargers, which discharge effluent to publicly-owned treatment works (POTWs), and three options for direct dischargers, which discharge effluent directly to a waterway. |
| Notes |
"April 1995"--Cover. Includes bibliographical references. "EPA 821-R-95-025"--Cover. |
