Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 1021 OF 3722

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Feasibility study analysis for CERCLA sites with volatile organic compounds in soil.
CORP Author Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response ;
Year Published 1994
Report Number EPA/540/R-94/080;9356.0-01; OSWER-9356.0-01
Stock Number PB95-963302
OCLC Number 32888810
Subjects Hazardous waste site remediation ; Volatile organic compounds ; Soil pollution
Additional Subjects Superfund ; Soil contamination ; Hazardous materials ; Land pollution control ; Site characterization ; Soil treatment ; Remediation ; Incineration ; Waste management ; Technology assessment ; Site surveys ; Feasibility studies ; Volatile organic compounds ; CERCLA(Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act) ; Soil vapor extraction ; Thermal desorption
Internet Access
Description Access URL
http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=2000A9I1.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EJAD  EPA 540/R-94-080 HWTIC Region 3 Library/Philadelphia, PA 08/04/1995
EJAD  OSWER Dir 9356.0-01 HWTIC Region 3 Library/Philadelphia, PA 08/04/1995
EJBD  EPA-540-R-94-080 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 08/14/2013
EJBD ARCHIVE OSWER Dir.-9356.0-01 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 02/07/2011
NTIS  PB95-963302 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. 01/01/1988
Collation 1 v. (various pagings) ; 28 cm.
Abstract
The report is an evaluation of technologies considered in the feasibility studies (FSs) of 21 volatile organic compound (VOC) contaminated soil sites. This evaluation analyzed technical literature and the results of the remedy selection process from the FSs and Records of Decisions (RODs) to formulate general conclusions about the application of these technologies at this site type. The evaluation concluded that certain technologies were routinely screened out based on effectiveness, implementability, or excessive costs. It therefore provides the basis for limiting the analysis of technologies and alternatives when applying the presumptive remedy approach.
Notes
"PB95-963302." "EPA/540/R-94/080." "9356.0-01." "August 1994."