||Parts washing alternatives study United States Coast Guard /
||Lockheed Environmental Systems and Technologies Co., Las Vegas, NV.;Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
|| Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ; Reproduced by U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Technical Information Service,
Metal cleaning--United States. ;
Organic solvents--United States.
Coast Guard operations ;
Pollution abatement ;
Waste management ;
Environmental impact assessments ;
Cleaning agents ;
Environmental chemical substitutes ;
Waste streams ;
Health hazards ;
Cost analysis ;
Aircraft components ;
New York ;
Case studies ;
Pollution prevention ;
Waste reduction ;
Coast Guard facilities
||Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy.
||70 pages ; 28 cm
The report has been written to assist the United States Coast Guard (USCG) industrial managers in determining the most cost effective and environmentally acceptable parts washing alternatives for their specific applications. An evaluation was conducted on four different cleaners from three different USCG facilities. The following parts cleaners were evaluated: Bio seven, Penatone 724, Safety-Kleen 105, and Brulin 815GD. All four cleaners are effective cleaners for the specific applications described in this evaluation. The evaluation included the categories of process description; environmental, safety and health impacts; cost analysis; and the material and emission reduction opportunities.
"January 1995." Includes bibliographical references. "EPA Contract No. 68-C4-0020, Pollution Prevention Research Support, Work Assignment 0-03." "EPA/600/R-95/006." "PB95-166146." Microfiche.