Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 13 OF 21

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) Method Study 22. Method 612-Chlorinated Hydrocarbons.
Author Hall, J. R. ; Florance, J. R. ; Strother, D. L. ; Wass, M. N. ;
CORP Author IT Enviroscience, Inc., Knoxville, TN.;Environmental Monitoring and Support Lab.-Cincinnati, OH.
Year Published 1984
Report Number EPA-68-03-2625; EPA-600/4-84-039;
Stock Number PB84-187772
Additional Subjects Chemical analysis ; Chlorine organic compounds ; Water pollution ; Sewage ; Industrial wastes ; Water analysis ; Chlorobenzenes ; Concentration(Composition) ; EPA method 612 ; Water pollution detection ; Ethane/hexachloro ; Butadiene/hexachloro ; Naphthalene/chloro ; Benzene/dichloro ; Benzene/trichloro ; Benzene/hexachloro ; Cyclopentadiene/hexachloro
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=P100N9HH.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
NTIS  PB84-187772 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 06/23/1988
Collation 107p
Abstract
An interlaboratory study in which 20 laboratories participated was conducted to provide precision and accuracy statements for the proposed EPA Method 612 - Chlorinated Hydrocarbons for measuring concentrations of the Category 3 chemicals hexachloroethane, hexachlorobutadiene, 2-chloronaphthalene, 1,2-dichlorobenzene, 1,3-dichlorobenzene, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, hexachlorobenzene, and hexachlorocyclopentadiene in municipal and industrial aqueous discharges. Hexachlorocyclopentadiene was eliminated from the study because of its instability in the solvent used to prepare sample concentrates. The study design was based on Youden's plan for collaborative tests of analytical methods. Three Youden pair samples of the test compounds were spiked into six types of test waters and then analyzed. The test waters were distilled water, tap water, a surface water, and three different industrial wastewater effluents. The resulting data were statistically analyzed using the computer program entitled 'Interlaboratory Method Validation Study' (IMVS). In all cases, there was no evidence of a statistically significant effect on accuracy or precision due to water type.