Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 2 OF 18

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Comparison of regulatory design concentrations : AERMOD vs ISCST3, CTDMPLUS, ISC-PRIME.
Other Authors
Author Title of a Work
Peters, Warren.
CORP Author Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis Div.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division,
Year Published 2003
Report Number EPA-454/R-03-002
Stock Number PB2006-108482
OCLC Number 53282399
Additional Subjects Consequence analysis ; Regulatory design ; Concentrations ; Air dispersion model ; Model evaluation ; AERMOD ; ISCST3 ; CTDMPLUS ; PRIME ; ISC-PRIME ; Air Pollution models
Internet Access
Description Access URL
http://www.epa.gov/scram001/7thconf/aermod/compar.pdf
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=P1009S4G.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EKBD  EPA-454/R-03-002 Research Triangle Park Library/RTP, NC 10/24/2003
NTIS  PB2006-108482 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. 04/04/2019
Collation 86 p. : ill. ; 28 cm.
Abstract
This report is a consequence analysis for the implementation of a new air dispersion model. A consequence analysis is designed to give the user community a sense of how regulatory design concentrations from the new model compare to those from an established model via a series of representative examples. For this study, the new model is AERMOD with the PRIME algorithms. The existing regulatory models used in this report are ISCST3, ISC-PRIME, and CTDMPLUS. This analysis shows, for an extensive number of typical source scenarios, the effects of the new model as compared to the existing regulatory model which it replaces. Overall, except for complex terrain, the models produce rather similar results, although there are significant differences for individual source types and settings. As expected in complex terrain, AERMOD typically produces concentrations that are lower than ISCST3. The model evaluation results, where available, support the differences seen between the models.
Notes
Project Officer: Warren Peters. "June 2003." "Staff Report." "EPA-454/R-03-002."