Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 49 OF 54

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Source Test and Evaluation Report: Cane Run Unit No. 6, Louisville Gas and Electric Co.
Author Scinto, L. L. ; Maddalone, R. F. ; McNeil, D. K. ; Wilson, J. A. ;
CORP Author TRW Environmental Engineering Div., Redondo Beach, CA.;Industrial Environmental Research Lab., Research Triangle Park, NC.
Year Published 1981
Report Number EPA-68-02-2197; EPA-600/7-81-134 ; IERL-RTP-1234
Stock Number PB81-238644
Additional Subjects Air pollution control equipment ; Electrostatic precipitators ; Assessments ; Concentration(Composition) ; Scrubbers ; Particles ; Electric power plants ; Flue gases ; Combustion products ; Industrial wastes ; Aluminum ; Cadmium ; Calcium ; Iron ; Manganese ; Nickel ; Lead(Metal) ; Phosphorus ; Louisville Gas and Electric Company ; Coal fired power plants ; Flue gas desulfurization
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
NTIS  PB81-238644 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. 06/23/1988
Collation 114p
Abstract
The report gives results of a comprehensive multimedia emissions assessment of a coal-fired boiler equipped with electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) and a dual-alkali flue gas desulfurization system. Flue gas pollutant concentrations were measured at the inlet and outlet of both control devices. Scrubbing efficiency for SO2 was 88%. Particulate removal efficiencies were 99.7% across the ESPs and 19% across the scrubbers for a total removal efficiency of 99.86%. Particulates (exclusive of H2SO4 aerosol) less than 3 micrometers in diameter accounted for 59% by weightof total particulate emissions. Emissions of primary sulfate removal efficiencies were 48% across the ESPs and 77% across the scrubbers. Particulate sulfate emissions after scrubbing accounted for about 50% by weight of total particulate emissions. The two liquid streams discharged from the site showed concentrations of Al, Ca, Cd, Fe, Mn, Ni, P, and Pb at levels of potential environmental concern. However, in most cases, the levels discharged to the river were not significantly different from those found in makeup water from the river. Waste solids consisted of three collected ash streams and scrubber filter cake. The ashes contained several elements of potential health and ecological concern but few organics (0.04-0.48 mg/kg).