Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 19 OF 38

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Economic impact analysis of the proposed halogenated solvent cleaners residual risk standard.
Other Authors
Author Title of a Work
Sorrels, John L.
CORP Author Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Health and Environmental Impacts Division, Air Benefits and Costs Group,
Year Published 2006
Report Number PB2007-106628; EPA-452/R-06-006
Stock Number PB2007-106628
OCLC Number 85479531
Subjects Air pollution--measurement ; Air quality--standards
Additional Subjects Halogenated solvents ; Solvent cleaners ; Proposed standard ; Economic impacts ; Regulatory options ; Compliance costs ; Revenues ;
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=P100QWZJ.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EKBD  EPA-452/R-06-006 Research Triangle Park Library/RTP, NC 03/16/2007
NTIS  PB2007-106628 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 04/04/2019
Collation 50 p. ; 28 cm.
Abstract
This report provides the economic impacts associated with this proposed standard. We provide economic impacts for six different regulatory options considered for the proposal. Two of these options will be proposed as part of this standard. The impacts in this report are estimated based on comparisons of annualized compliance costs to the revenues for affected firms. We find that the impacts of these options are generally minimal to small businesses except for the most stringent scenario (known as Regulatory Option 6), and that large businesses should experience cost savings for the most part. We find that small firms are 66 percent of the businesses affected under each of the options considered in this analysis. These impacts range from only 5 firms (4 small) out of 281 (186 small) having some positive cost to sales estimate for the least stringent option (known as Regulatory Option Scenario 1) to 146 firms (124 small) that have some positive cost to sales estimate, with 8 small firms out of these 124 having annualized compliance costs of greater than 3 percent of sales. For the proposed options, Regulatory Option Scenarios 3 and 4, the impacts range from 9 firms (6 small) that have some positive cost to sales estimate to 38 firms (32 small) that have a positive cost to sales estimate. There is no significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities (or SISNOSE) under either of the proposed options.
Notes
Project officer: John L. Sorrels. August 2006. EPA-452/R-06-006.