||MAGIC DDRP Final Report: Summary of Results for Individual Catchments. Volume 3.
Cosby, B. J. ;
Hornberger, G. M. ;
Ryan, P. F. ;
Wolock, D. M. ;
||Virginia Univ., Charlottesville. Dept. of Environmental Sciences. ;Oak Ridge National Lab., TN. Environmental Sciences Div. ;Geological Survey, West Trenton, NJ. Water Resources Div.;Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR.
Water quality ;
Computerized simulation ;
Water pollution ;
Regional analysis ;
Statistical analysis ;
Air water interactions ;
Air pollution ;
Surface-groundwater relationships ;
Soil surveys ;
Model of Acidification of Groundwater In Catchments ;
Northeast Region(United States) ;
Southeast Region(United States)
||Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy.
The volume contains summary results of MAGIC calibrations for the DDRP catchments. The summaries are presented for individual catchments within the northeastern and southeastern regions. A separate volume contains regional analyses of the results across all catchments in the northeastern and southeastern regions. The summaries are given for all catchments in each region for which successful calibrations of MAGIC were obtained. The catchment data are drawn from the results files forwarded to Corvallis. The calibration protocol for MAGIC applied to the DDRP catchments involved multiple calibrations for each catchment. Ten calibrations were attempted for each catchment. A catchment was not considered calibrated until at least three calibrations were successful. The multiple calibrations were performed in order to estimate the uncertainty in the calibrated model for each catchment. The procedure is described in detail in another volume. Because multiple calibrations are available for each catchment, the results summarized here for simulated values (or changes in simulated values) are the median (MED) values of all calibrations for an individual catchment. The uncertainies in simulated values (or changes in simulated values) are presented as the difference in the maximum and minimum (MX-MN) values resulting from the multiple calibrations.