Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 12 OF 22

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Procedures for evaluating the performance of air quality simulation models /
Author Hillyer, M. J. ; Reynolds, S. D. ; Roth, P. M.
Other Authors
Author Title of a Work
Reynolds, S. D.
Roth, P. M.
CORP Author Systems Applications, Inc., San Rafael, CA.;Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ; National Technical Information Service [distributor],
Year Published 1979
Report Number EPA/450-4-79-033; EPA-68-02-2593
Stock Number PB80-125206
OCLC Number 08276338
Subjects Air--Pollution--Measurement--Methodology. ; Air quality.
Additional Subjects Air pollution ; Mathematical models ; Performance evaluation ; Reviews ; Air quality
Internet Access
Description Access URL
http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=91010VV9.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EJAD  EPA 450/4-79-033 Region 3 Library/Philadelphia, PA 01/07/1994
EJBD ARCHIVE EPA 450-4-79-033 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 03/26/2014
EKAM  EPA-450/4-79-033 Region 4 Library/Atlanta,GA 09/12/1997
EKBD  EPA-450/4-79-033 Research Triangle Park Library/RTP, NC 08/27/1999
ERAD  EPA 450/4-79-033 Region 9 Library/San Francisco,CA 02/04/2013
ESAD  EPA 450-4-79-033 Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA 03/23/2010
NTIS  PB80-125206 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 01/01/1988
Collation xi, 146 pages : illustrations ; 28 cm
Abstract
Currently there are no standardized guidelines for evaluating the performance of air quality simulation models. In this report, a procedural framework for objectively evaluating model performance is developed. In carrying out this work, the authors have: reviewed previous model evaluation studies; developed a general procedural framework for performing an evaluation study; provided specific guidance, to the extent possible, with respect to the work required in each step of the performance evaluation procedure; and identified gaps in present knowledge that limited our ability to provide more detailed guidance in this report, and presented recommendations for further work that will help to fill those gaps. Because model evaluation has received relatively little systematic attention to date, it was possible to identify several areas ripe for future investigation. The performance of these suggested studies will be essential to the success of the guidelines presented herein.
Notes
"Systems Applications, Incorporated." "October 1979." Includes bibliographical references (pages 141-145). "Contract no. 68-02-2593." "EPA/450-4-79-033."