Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 2 OF 2

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Review of radium toxicity studies
Author Chiacchierini, Richard P. ; Chiacchierin, Richard P. ; Jessu, Gordon L. ; Nelso, Neal S. ; Telle, Norman C. ; Tompkin, Edythalena
Other Authors
Author Title of a Work
Chiacchierini, Richard P.
CORP Author United States. Bureau of Radiological Health. Division of Biological Effects.; Bureau of Radiological Health, Rockville, Md. Div. of Biological Effects.
Publisher U.S. Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, Bureau of Radiological Health,
Year Published 1970
Report Number BRH/DBE-70-5;
Stock Number PB-196 992
OCLC Number 06898859
Additional Subjects Radium--Tocicology ; Radiation--Dosage ; Toxicity) ; Radiation effects ; Thresholds(Perception) ; Sensitivity ; Responses ; Radiation tolerance ; Public health ; Humans ; Animals
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EKBD  BRH/DBE 70-5 Research Triangle Park Library/RTP, NC 12/28/2001
EKBD  BRH/DBE70-05 Research Triangle Park Library/RTP, NC 12/28/2001
NTIS  PB-196 992 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 04/04/2019
Collation 31 p. ; 26 cm.
Abstract
The debate concerning the linear or threshold response of somatic radiation injury has recently been focused on the human radium toxicity studies. Because of the critical public health significance of the data derived from these studies, a task group from the Division of Biological Effects of the Bureau of Radiological Health undertook a review of the available human and animal radium studies for the purpose of determining the extent to which animal and human data are sufficient to resolve the questions of a dose-response relationship. The review contained in this report indicates that the animal and human radium experience to date is not sufficient to specify an unequivocal dose-response model. Therefore, in the low dose regions expected to be experienced by the general public, the assumption of a linear, non-threshold model continues to be a prudent health philosophy for standards setting. (Author)
Notes
"BRH/DBE 70-5." Includes bibliographical references (p. 25-28).