Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog


OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Assessing asbestos exposure in public buildings /
Author Hatfield, J. ; Stockrahm, J. ; Todt, F. ; Ogden, J. ; Leczynski, B.
CORP Author Battelle Columbus Div., Washington, DC. ;Price Associates, Washington, DC. ;Alliance Technologies Corp., Bedford, MA. ;Lee (R.J.) Group, Inc., Monroeville, PA.;Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Toxic Substances.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agencu,
Year Published 1988
Report Number EPA/560/5-88/002; EPA-68-02-4294; EPA-68-02-3997
Stock Number PB88-230909
OCLC Number 18842388
Subjects Asbestos. ; Asbestos in building. ; Asbestos in buildings
Additional Subjects Air pollution control ; Asbestos ; Public buildings ; Standards ; Exposure ; Indoor air pollution ; Toxic substances ; Environmental monitoring ; Risk assessment
Internet Access
Description Access URL
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
EJBD ARCHIVE EPA 560-5-88-002 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 03/14/2017
EJED NPCD EPA 560-5-88-002 OCSPP Chemical Library/Washington,DC 08/10/2001
EJED  EPA 560-5-88-002 OCSPP Chemical Library/Washington,DC 08/10/2001
ESAD  EPA 560-5-88-002 Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA 03/23/2010
NTIS  PB88-230909 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 01/01/1988
Collation xvi, 185 pages : illustrations ; 28 cm.
Airborne asbestos levels were measured by direct transmission electron microscopy in 49 public buildings from three categories: (1) buildings without asbestos-containing material (ACM); (2) buildings with all or most of the ACM in good condition allowing for a limited number of areas of moderate damage; and (3) buildings which had at least one area of significantly damaged ACM or numerous areas of moderate damage. Although the absolute airborne asbestos levels were very low, Category (3) had the highest median levels followed by Category (2), Category (1), and outdoors. Category (3) levels were significantly higher than Category (1). Another objective was to field test an assessment method for ACM developed facilitate abatement decision making in the context of an asbestos management program. Using rate consistency as an evaluation criterion, the three factors showed promise as assessment tools for use in the field. Each factor showed statistically significant consistency among raters.
"May 1988." Includes glossary. Includes bibliographical references (pages 68-69). Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under contract