Main Title |
EnviroGard PCB test kit, Millipore, Inc. : innovative technology evaluation report / |
Author |
Hess, E. ;
Hamilton, D.
|
CORP Author |
PRC Environmental, Inc., Kansas City, KS. ;Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA.;National Risk Management Research Lab., Cincinnati, OH. |
Publisher |
U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, |
Year Published |
1995 |
Report Number |
EPA/540/R-95/517; 68-C0-0047; EPA-68-CO-0047 |
Stock Number |
PB96-116504 |
OCLC Number |
33868897 |
Subjects |
Soil pollution
|
Additional Subjects |
Polychlorinated biphenyls ;
Soil contamination ;
Detection ;
Sampling ;
Immunoassay ;
Testing ;
Monitoring ;
Soil tests ;
Hazardous materials ;
Arochlor ;
Site characterization ;
Performance evaluation ;
Accuracy ;
Quality assurance ;
Test kits
|
Internet Access |
|
Holdings |
Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last Modified |
Checkout Status |
EHAM |
TD879.P64E58 1995 |
|
Region 1 Library/Boston,MA |
04/29/2016 |
EJBD |
EPA 540-R-95-517 |
|
Headquarters Library/Washington,DC |
09/06/2016 |
EJDD |
EPA/540/R-95/517 |
|
Env Science Center Library/Ft Meade,MD |
10/09/1998 |
ELBD ARCHIVE |
EPA 540-R-95-517 |
Received from HQ |
AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH |
10/04/2023 |
DISPERSAL |
EMBD |
EPA/540/R-95/517 |
|
NRMRL/GWERD Library/Ada,OK |
05/10/1996 |
ESAD |
EPA 540-R-95-517 |
|
Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA |
12/08/1995 |
NTIS |
PB96-116504 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
Collation |
ix, 42 pages : illustrations ; 28 cm |
Abstract |
This report describes the demonstration and evaluation of an immunoassay field screening technology designed to determine polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) contamination in soil. The immunoassay technology was the EnviroGard PCB Test developed by Millipore, Inc. The principal objective of the demonstration was to evaluate the technology for accuracy and precision at detecting high and low levels of PCB in soil samples by comparing their results to those attained by a confirmatory laboratory using standard EPA analytical methods. The technology also was qualitatively evaluated for the length of time required for analysis, ease of use, portability, and operating cost. Accuracy was also assessed through analysis of performance evaluation (PE) samples, and precision was further assessed by comparing the results obtained on duplicate samples. A secondary objective of the demonstration was to evaluate the specificity of the technology. The evaluation of specificity was performed by examining any problems due to naturally occurring matrix effects, site-specific matrix effects, Aroclor sensitivity, and chemical cross reactivity. |
Notes |
"August 1995." Includes bibliographical references (page 42). "EPA/540-R-95-517." |