Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 21 OF 28

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Feasibility of commercialized water treatment techniques for concentrated waste spills /
Author Ghassemi, Masood. ; Yu, Kar ; Quinlivan, Sandra
Other Authors
Author Title of a Work
Yu, Kar Yuk.
Quinlivan, S.
CORP Author TRW Environmental Engineering Div., Redondo Beach, CA.;Municipal Environmental Research Lab., Cincinnati, OH.
Publisher Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory,
Year Published 1981
Report Number EPA-600/2-81-213; EPA-68-03-2560
Stock Number PB 82-108440
OCLC Number 09075749
Subjects Hazardous substances--Accidents. ; Water--Purification.
Additional Subjects Hazardous materials ; Water pollution control ; Feasibility ; Ion exchanging ; Oxidation ; Activated sludge process ; Coagulation ; Precipitation(Chemistry) ; Filtration ; Mobile equipment ; Cost analysis ; Capitalized costs ; Reverse osmosis ; Ultrafiltration
Internet Access
Description Access URL
http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=9100LY9J.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EJBD ARCHIVE EPA-600-2-81-213 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 08/04/2014
NTIS  PB82-108440 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 06/23/1988
Collation x, 114 p. : ill.
Abstract
The suitability and economics of using reverse osmosis, ultrafiltration, ion exchange, wet air oxidation, high purity oxygen activated sludge process, ultraviolet-ozone oxidation, and coagulation/precipitation for on-site treatment of concentrated wastes were evaluated. Published literature data and data obtained from process suppliers provided the basis for the evaluation. When used alone, none of the processes considered would be economically applicable to on-site mobile unit treatment of the variety of concentrated wastes encountered, although reverse osmosis, ion exchange, and wet air oxidation meet many of the application requirements and hence require less pretreatment and/or post-treatment. The estimated capital costs for a unit suitable for trailer mounting vary from as low as $35,000 for a 227,000 liters/day (60,000 gpd) ultrafiltration unit to as high as $1.25 to $1.5 million for a 54,000 liters/day (14,400 gpd) 2-trailer wet air oxidation unit. For short-term operation, the operating cost of the mobile unit is determined largely by non-process specific costs (for example, transportation, labor subsistence, analytical support, etc.), which vary from situation to situation.
Notes
Sponsored by the Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory. Final task report. Bibliography: p. 114. Photocopy.