Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 36 OF 82

Main Title Inter-agency Workgroup on Air Quality Modeling (IWAQM) : assessment of phase I recommendations regarding the use of MESOPUFF II /
CORP Author Systems Applications International, San Rafael, CA. ;National Park Service, Denver, CO. Air Quality Div. ;Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO. ;Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, CO.;Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis Div.
Publisher United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards,
Year Published 1995
Report Number EPA-454/R-95-006; EPA-68-D-30019
Stock Number PB95-241931
OCLC Number 32870183
Subjects Air quality management
Additional Subjects Air pollution dispersion ; Atmospheric diffusion ; Diffusion modeling ; Long range transport ; Air pollution monitoring ; Aerosols ; Meteorological data ; Visibility ; Distance ; Mathematical models ; Air pollution effects ; Atmospheric transport ; Air pollution control ; Forest land ; National parks ; Wilderness areas ; MESOPUFF II computer program
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=2000EAK4.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EHAM  EPA-454/R-95-006 Region 1 Library/Boston,MA 05/25/2016
EKBD  EPA-454/R-95-006 Research Triangle Park Library/RTP, NC 12/12/2003
ELBD ARCHIVE EPA 454-R-95-006 Received from HQ AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 10/04/2023
ESAD  EPA-454-R-95-006 Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA 08/18/1995
NTIS  PB95-241931 Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. 07/26/2022
Collation 1 volume (various pagings) : illustrations ; 28 cm
Abstract
This report documents results from a case study to apply the MESOPUFF II air quality modeling system following the IWAQM interim recommendations (PB93-223170). The study objectives were to identify and summarize the decisions made; record and summarize the resolution process for these decisions; and provide a written record of the resources used to complete the effort. As will be seen in the discussion, limitations in funding resources necessitated only partial implementation of the interim recommendations. Acceptance of these or similar strategies in an actual assessment can only be addressed on a case-by-case basis involving the relevant review authorities in the context of an actual situation. The IWQM concludes that the findings confirm the need for active interaction between applicant and all the reviewing authorities (EPA, State, Federal Land Managers), and that this interaction should occur as soon as feasible.
Notes
"April 1995"--Cover. "EPA-454/R-95-006."