| Main Title |
Identification of cost factors for the ocean disposal alternative for low-level radioactive waste / |
| Author |
Hill, Douglas, ;
Sailor, V. L.
|
| Other Authors |
|
| CORP Author |
Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY. Nuclear Waste Research Group.;Office of Radiation Programs, Washington, DC. |
| Publisher |
Office of Radiation Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, |
| Year Published |
1985 |
| Report Number |
EPA 520/1-84-026; EPA 520/1-84-026 |
| Stock Number |
PB93-203917 |
| OCLC Number |
11901383 |
| Subjects |
Waste disposal in the ocean--United States--Costs
|
| Additional Subjects |
Marine disposal ;
Radioactive waste disposal ;
Low-level radioactive wastes ;
Radionuclide migration ;
Cost benefit analysis ;
Cost comparison ;
Comparative evaluations ;
Ground disposal ;
Cost factors
|
| Internet Access |
|
| Holdings |
| Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last
Modified |
Checkout
Status |
| ELBD ARCHIVE |
EPA 520-1-84-026 |
Received from HQ |
AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH |
10/04/2023 |
| NTIS |
PB93-203917 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
| Collation |
vii, 23 p. ; 28 cm. |
| Abstract |
A set of economic ground rules is proposed for making cost comparisons between various alternative options for disposing of low-level radioactive wastes. Included are procedures for converting all costs to a common basis and a description of the types of costs which should be included. The major cost factors are identified for several alternatives for the disposal of contaminated soils and neutron activated metallic structures. A program for the actual cost analysis is outlined, and manpower estimates for the studies are presented. |
| Notes |
Final. "Nuclear Waste Research Group, Department of Nuclear Energy, Brookhaven National Laboratory." "December 1984." "EPA 520/1-84-026". Office of Radiation Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. |
| Contents Notes |
"A set of economic ground rules is proposed for making cost comparisons between various alternative options for disposing of low-level radioactive wastes. Included are procedures for converting all costs to a common basis and a description of the types of costs which should be included. The major cost factors are identified for several alternatives for the disposal of contaminated soils and neutron activated metallic structures. A program for the actual cost analysis is outlined, and manpower estimates for the studies are presented."--Abstract. |
