Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 22 OF 97

Main Title Evaluation of oil spill dispersant testing requirements.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory,
Year Published 1988
Report Number EPA/600-S2-87-070
OCLC Number 17937748
Subjects Oil spills ; Surface active agents--Testing
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=2000TLLT.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EJBD  EPA 600-S2-87-070 In Binder Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 11/06/2018
ELBD ARCHIVE EPA 600-S2-87-070 In Binder Received from HQ AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 10/04/2023
Collation 7 pages ; 28 cm
Notes
Caption title. At head of title: Project summary. Distributed to depository libraries in microfiche. "Jan. 1988." "EPA/600-S2-87-070."
Contents Notes
"This research program was initiated to evaluate the cost and effectiveness of the procedures for testing oil spill dispersants as specified in the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan, Annex X. The testing procedure is described in detail in the Standard EPA Dispersant Effectiveness and Toxicity Tests (EPA-R2-73-201) and in Annex X. These procedures were examined using No. 2 and No. 6 fuel oils and six commercial oil spill dispersants. The methods were evaluated in terms of reliability, precision, cost-effectiveness, and applicability. Seven laboratory methods for testing dispersant effectiveness using commercial oil spill products and No. 2 and No. 6 fuel oils were evaluated. The tests included the EPA, Mackay, Russian, French, Warren Spring, and two interfacial tension test methods (one based on the du Nouy ring principle and the other on drop-weight). These tests were reviewed in terms of type, scale, method of applying mixing energy, and the time required to conduct a product evaluation. The experimental results, compared in terms of the precision of the test data and how effective the six nonionic dispersants were, demonstrate that the relative effectiveness found for the dispersants varies appreciably as a function of the testing method. Reasons for the variation are discussed, and recommendations are presented on how to achieve dispersant testing data that are more representative of open-sea conditions. On the basis of these findings, recommendations for revision to the Standard Dispersant Effectiveness Test from Annex X and the Standard Dispersant Toxicity Test were made and have been included as part of the full report."