Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 8 OF 19

Main Title In situ steam enhanced recovery process : SITE technology capsule.
Author Cook, K.
CORP Author Science Applications International Corp., San Diego, CA.;National Risk Management Research Lab., Cincinnati, OH.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Risk Management Research Laboratory,
Year Published 1995
Report Number EPA/540/R-94/510a; EPA-68-CO-0048
Stock Number PB95-270476
OCLC Number 33251423
Subjects Diesel fuels ; Injectors ; Soil pollution ; Hazardous waste sites--California--Huntington Beach
Additional Subjects Materials recovery ; Steam ; Injection ; Soil pollution ; Superfund ; Research and development ; Technology assessment ; Performance evaluation ; Field tests ; Diesel fuels ; Vacuum ; Extraction ; Organic compounds ; Economic analysis ; SITE program ; In situ process ; SERP(Steam Enhanced Recovery Process) ; Rainbow Disposal site ; Huntington Beach(California) ; VOCs(Volatile organic compounds)
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=10002411.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EHAM  TD879.D54I5 1995 Region 1 Library/Boston,MA 04/29/2016
EJBD  EPA 540-R-94-510a c.1 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 04/02/2014
ELBD ARCHIVE EPA 540-R-94-510a Received from HQ AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 10/04/2023
ELBD  EPA 540-R-94-510a AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 11/15/2016
EMBD  EPA/540/R-94/510a NRMRL/GWERD Library/Ada,OK 12/28/2001
NTIS  PB95-270476 Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. 07/26/2022
Collation 8 pages : illustrations, map ; 28 cm.
Abstract
This Technology Capsule report summarizes the findings of an evaluation of the in situ Steam Enhanced Recovery Process (SERP) operated by Hughes Environmental Systems, Inc. at the Rainbow Disposal facility in Huntington Beach, California. The technology demonstrated was conducted concurrent with a full-scale remedial action using the technology on an underground diesal leak. From this demonstration, it was concluded that the SERP process did not achieve the remedial goals desired at this site and there were significant operational problems. It is believed that these operational problems can be solved and substantially better performance can be attained. The cost of treatment was quite low, as expected with an in-situ process.
Notes
Caption title. "EPA/540/R-94/510a." "August 1995."