Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 5 OF 23

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Development of compliance levels from analytical detection and quantitation levels /
CORP Author Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Year Published 1995
Report Number PB95-216321
Stock Number PB95-216321
OCLC Number 45272958
Subjects Water--Pollution--Measurement--Evaluation. ; Water quality--Measurement--Evaluation.
Additional Subjects Water pollution detection ; Pollution regulations ; Water quality ; Compliance ; Water pollution monitoring ; Test methods ; Quantitative analysis ; Chemical analysis ; Interlaboratory comparisons ; Standard deviation ; Toxic substances ; MDL(Method detection limit) ; Analytical methods
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=9101IMKK.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EHAD  EPA 950-F-95-002 Region 1 Library/Boston,MA 04/22/2013
ESAD  EPA 1052 Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA 11/03/2000
NTIS  PB95-216321 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. 09/02/1995
Collation 10, [3] p. : charts ; 28 cm.
Abstract
The issue paper provides an overview of the use of analytical detection and quantitation levels as compliance limits and a rationale for use of the Minimum Level (ML) as the quantitation level appropriate for such limits. The paper also provides strategies for clarification of the Method Detection Limit (MDL) and the ML to mitigate concerns by industry and others about the use of these measurements for regulatory compliance.
Notes
Includes bibliographical references. "Price: PC A03/MF A01." Available from NTIS, Springfield, VA 22161.
Contents Notes
"The issue paper provides an overview of the use of analytical detection and quantitation levels as compliance limits and a rationale for the use of the Minimum Level (ML) as the quantitation level appropriate for such limits. The paper also provides strategies for clarification of the Method Detection Limit (MDL) and the ML to mitigate concerns by industry and others about the use of these measurements for regulatory compliance."--Abstract.