Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog
RECORD NUMBER: 15 OF 16Main Title | Silicate Technology Corporation's solidification/stabilization technology for organic and inorganic contaminants in soils : applications analysis report / | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Author | Bates, E. | |||||||||||
CORP Author | PRC Environmental Management, Inc., McLean, VA.;Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. | |||||||||||
Publisher | U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, | |||||||||||
Year Published | 1992 | |||||||||||
Report Number | EPA/540/AR-92/010; EPA-68-03-3484; EPA-68-CO-0047 | |||||||||||
Stock Number | PB93-172948 | |||||||||||
Subjects | Hazardous waste sites | |||||||||||
Additional Subjects | Soil treatment ; Solidification ; Stabilization ; Hazardous materials ; Waste treatment ; Remedial action ; Wood preservatives ; Land pollution control ; Immobilization ; Silicate minerals ; Organic compounds ; Inorganic compounds ; Economic analysis ; Materials handling ; Pentachlorophenol ; Silicate Technology Corporation ; Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program ; Innovative treatment technology | |||||||||||
Internet Access |
|
|||||||||||
Holdings |
|
|||||||||||
Collation | 150 pages : illustrations ; 28 cm | |||||||||||
Abstract | The STC demonstration was conducted under EPA's Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program in November, 1990, at the Selma Pressure Treating (SPT) wood preserving site in Selma, California. The SPT site was contaminated with both organics, predominantly pentachlorophenol (PCP), inorganics, mainly arsenic, chromium, and copper. Extensive sampling and analyses were performed on the waste both before and after treatment to compare physical, chemical, and leaching characteristics of raw and treated wastes. STC's contaminated soil treatment process was evaluated based on contaminant mobility measured by numerous leaching tests, structural integrity of the solidified material, measured by physical and engineering tests and morphological examinations; and economic analysis, using cost information supplied by STC and the results of the SITE demonstration, the vendor's design and test data, and other laboratory and field applications of the technology. It discusses the advantages, disadvantages, and limitations, as well as estimated costs of the technology. |
|||||||||||
Notes | "EPA/540/AR-92/010." "December 1992." Microfiche. |