Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 165 OF 166

Main Title Water Use Efficiency of Vegetable Crops Given over Asphalt Moisture Barriers.
Author Scarboroug, Ernest N. ; Liebhard, William C. ;
CORP Author Delaware Univ., Newark. Water Resources Center.
Year Published 1972
Report Number DI-14-31-0001-3008 ;DI-14-31-0001-3208; OWRR-A-012-DEL; A-012-DEL(1),; 03907
Stock Number PB-214 120
Additional Subjects ( Soil moisture ; Barrier materials) ; ( Water consumption ; Vegetable crops) ; Asphalts ; Efficiency ; Nitrogen inorganic compounds ; Sands ; Leaching ; Yield ; Productivity ; Rainfall ; Delaware ; Asphalt moisture barriers ; Water use
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
NTIS  PB-214 120 Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. 07/26/2022
Collation 15p
Abstract
The effectiveness of a subsurface asphalt moisture barrier in increasing yields of vegetable crops grown on loamy sand soils was investigated. Six vegetable crops were grown under conditions of irrigation and no irrigation with and without a barrier. Average yield increases of all crops over the barrier without irrigation were 46%, 58% and 55% for 1967, 1968 and 1969 respectively. With irrigation, yield increases were 35%, 16% and 30% for 1967, 1968 and 1969. Yield increases were due to a combination of increased water retention and a reduction in nitrate leaching due to excessive rainfall. The barrier increased the water holding capacity of the soil in top 2 feet by approximately 1.25 inches or an additional 70% in available water. In laboratory leaching studies with simulated barriers using high rates of nitrogen, 2 1/2 times as much nitrate remained in the top 2 feet of the soil compared to no barrier with a 5 inch application of water. A summary of yields by crop and graphs of the movement of nitrate, ammonium and potassium are included. The asphalt moisture barrier has proven to be an effective production practice with sandy soils where irrigation is not feasible. (Author)