Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 4 OF 6

Main Title National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program : double-blind proficiency-testing pilot study, final report /
CORP Author Battelle Memorial Institute.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Year Published 2001
Report Number EPA 747-R-01-004
Stock Number PB2001-105287
OCLC Number 879288694
Subjects Research, Industrial--Laboratories--Accreditation--United States--Handbooks, manuals, etc
Additional Subjects Lead(Metal) ; Double-blind ; Quality assurance ; Data analysis ; Operations ; Participants ; Recommendations ; Design ; Execution ; Data collection ; National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program(NLLAP) ; Environmental Protection Agency ; Proficiency testing
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=P1009H1X.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
ELBD ARCHIVE EPA 747-R-01-004 Received from HQ AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 10/04/2023
NTIS  PB2001-105287 Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. 07/26/2022
Collation 138 pages : illustrations, charts, forms ; 28 cm
Abstract
This report documents the design, execution, results, and conclusions of a pilot study to gather information on how a double-blind proficiency-testing program could be incorporated within EPAs National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP). Currently, the proficiency-testing program used within the NLLAP is the Environmental Lead Proficiency Analytical Testing (ELPAT) Program (NIOSH, 1994). The ELPAT Program is single-blind, in that the laboratories are aware that they have received a batch of proficiency-test samples for analysis, but they are unaware of the amounts of lead in these samples. In a double-blind program, the laboratory is unaware that its proficiency is being evaluated. Neither is the laboratory aware that proficiency-test samples are included within a batch of samples received for analysis. Therefore, a double-blind program is more likely than a single-blind program to characterize the overall performance of routine field sample analyses.
Notes
"March 2001." Includes bibliographical references.