Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog
RECORD NUMBER: 29 OF 78| Main Title | Field Performance of Woodburning and Coalburning Appliances in Crested Butte during the 1989-90 Heating Season. | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Jaasma, D. R. ; Champion, M. R. ; Gundappa., M. ; | |||||||||||
| CORP Author | Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering.;Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Air and Energy Engineering Research Lab. | |||||||||||
| Publisher | Oct 91 | |||||||||||
| Year Published | 1991 | |||||||||||
| Report Number | EPA-A00818389; EPA/600/7-91/005; | |||||||||||
| Stock Number | PB92-106921 | |||||||||||
| Additional Subjects | Air pollution sampling ; Heaters ; Appliances ; Energy consumption ; Colorado ; Environmental engineering ; Wood burning appliances ; Coal burning appliances ; Houses ; Burning rate ; Performance evaluation ; Stoves ; Colorado ; Residential buildings ; Quality assurance ; Particles ; Carbon monoxide ; Crested Butte(Colorado) ; EPA region 8 | |||||||||||
| Holdings |
|
|||||||||||
| Collation | 156p | |||||||||||
| Abstract | The field performance of woodburning and coalburning appliances in and around Crested Butte, CO, has been evaluated. Measurements included particulate matter (PM), carbon monoxide (CO), and weekly average burn rates. Woodburning appliances included conventional airtight stoves, EPA-certified catalytic stoves, and EPA-certified noncatalytic stoves. Compared to the emissions measured from conventional stoves, the certified stoves reduced PM emission factors (g/kg) by 53% and CO emission factors by 49%. Coalburning appliances included a commercial scale boiler, a residential stoker, and hand-fired coalstove. The coalburning appliances were compared to conventional woodstoves on a grams of pollutant per joule of heat output basis. The automatically stoked coal appliances reduced PM and CO emissions by roughly 84% and 85%, respectively. The hand-fired stove was cleaner than expected, reducing PM by 55% and CO by 27%. |