Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 7 OF 10

Main Title Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: Policy Assessment of Scientific and Technical Information. OAQPS Staff Paper.
CORP Author Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Publisher Jul 2007
Year Published 2007
Report Number EPA/452/R-07/007;
Stock Number PB2008-106501
Additional Subjects Air quality standards ; Ozone ; Health risks ; Environmental exposure ; NAAQS(National ambient air quality standards) ; National ambient air quality standards ; Risk assessment ; Policy analysis ; Technical information ; Health effects ; Toxicity ; Mortality ; Epidemiology ;
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=P100LQGB.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
NTIS  PB2008-106501 Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. 07/26/2022
Collation 609p
Abstract
This Staff Paper, prepared by staff in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agencys (EPA) Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS), evaluates the policy implications of the key studies and scientific information contained in the document, Air Quality Criteria for Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants (USEPA, 2006; henceforth referred to as the CD), prepared by EPAs National Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA). This document also presents and interprets results from several quantitative analyses (e.g., air quality analyses, human exposure analyses, human health risk assessments, and an environmental assessment of vegetation-related impacts) that we believe should also be considered in EPA's current review of the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone (O(sub 3)), and presents factors relevant to the evaluation of current primary and secondary 03 standards. Finally, this document presents staff conclusions and recommendations on a range of policy options that we believe are appropriate for the Administrator to consider concerning whether, and if so how, to revise the primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) O(sub 3) NAAQS.