Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 551 OF 2819

Main Title Comparison of four methodologies to project emissions for the St. Louis metropolitan area /
Author Consroe., T. J.
Other Authors
Author Title of a Work
Masser, Charles C.
Consroe, T. J.
CORP Author Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Bethesda, Md.;Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, N.C. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Waste Management, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards,
Year Published 1975
Report Number EPA-450/3-75-074; EPA-68-02-1005
Stock Number PB-247 643
OCLC Number 45421291
Subjects Air--Pollution--Missouri--Saint Louis--Forecasting ; Air quality--Missouri--Saint Louis--Forecasting
Additional Subjects Air pollution ; Urban areas ; Forecasting ; Projection ; Methodology ; Missouri ; Illinois ; Metropolitan areas ; Sulfur oxides ; Particles ; Management planning ; Air pollution abatement ; Hydrocarbons ; Carbon monoxide ; Comparison ; Regions ; Alternatives ; Air quality maintenance ; Saint Louis(Missouri)
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=910104YB.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EKBD  EPA-450/3-75-074 Research Triangle Park Library/RTP, NC 12/01/2000
ELBD ARCHIVE EPA 450-3-75-074 Received from HQ AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 10/04/2023
ESAD  EPA 450-3-75-074 Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA 03/23/2010
NTIS  PB-247 643 Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. 07/26/2022
Collation 46, [1] p. : ill. ; 28 cm.
Abstract
This report describes a comparison of four alternate methodologies which were used to project air pollution emissions for the metropolitan St. Louis area. Two of the four methodologies also forecast expected ambient air quality levels. The purpose of the study was to summarize the structure and nature of each projection methodology, to compare the numerical projection results, and to discuss the relative advantages of each methodology.
Notes
EPA Project Officer: Charles C. Masser. Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency by Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc. "Author(s): T.J. Consroe"--Colophon. "October 1975." Final report. Also available via the World Wide Web. Includes bibliographical references. "EPA-450/3-75-074."
Contents Notes
This report describes a comparison of four alternate methodologies which were used to project air pollution emissions for the metropolitan St. Louis area. Two of the four methodologies also forecast expected ambient air quality levels. The purpose of the study was to: * Summarize the structure and nature of each projection mehtodology * Compare the numerical projection results * Discuss the relative advantages of each methodology.