Main Title |
An intercomparison of grinding techniques used for the preparation of lead-in paint samples / |
Author |
Hodson, L. L. ;
Hardison, E. D. ;
Leinbach, A. A. ;
Messner, M. J. ;
Binstock, D. A.
|
Other Authors |
|
CORP Author |
Research Triangle Inst., Research Triangle Park, NC. Center for Environmental Measurements and Quality Assurance.;Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. National Exposure Research Lab. |
Publisher |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, |
Year Published |
1997 |
Report Number |
EPA/600/R-95/112; EPA-68-D1-0009; EPA-68-D5-0040; RTI-91U-6660-014; RTI-91U-6970-255 |
Stock Number |
PB98-131881 |
OCLC Number |
47694691 |
Additional Subjects |
Lead(Metal) ;
Paints ;
Grinding ;
Sample preparation ;
Sampling ;
Chemical analysis ;
Comparative evaluations ;
Statistical analysis ;
Quality assurance ;
Quality control
|
Internet Access |
|
Holdings |
Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last Modified |
Checkout Status |
EJED |
EPA/600/R-95/112 |
|
OCSPP Chemical Library/Washington,DC |
10/04/2002 |
NTIS |
PB98-131881 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
Collation |
88 pages ; 28 cm |
Abstract |
The method used to grind a dried paint sample prior to acid digestion and measurement (by inductively coupled plasma (ICP) emission spectrometry or some other means), may affect the recovery of lead from the paint. In the study, five grinding techniques were compared. These were: (1) grinding with a glass rod at room temperature in a 50-mL centrifuge tube, (2) grinding with a glass rod at dry ice temperature in a 50-mL centrifuge tube, (3) grinding with a mortar and pestile, (4) grinding with a motorized blender, and (5) grinding with a cryogenic mill that operated at liquid nitrogen temperature. |
Notes |
"S.L. Harper, work assignment manager." "EPA/600/R-95/112." ""September 1997." Microfiche. |