Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 28 OF 79

Main Title Experimental evaluation of oxygen and air activated sludge nitrification systems with and without pH control /
Author Heidman, James A.
CORP Author District of Columbia Dept. of Environmental Services, Washington.;Municipal Environmental Research Lab., Cincinnati, Ohio.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development,Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory,
Year Published 1976
Report Number EPA-600/2-76-180; EPA-68-03-0349; EPA-ROAP21-ASR; 026
Stock Number PB-262 197
OCLC Number 07879314
Subjects Sewage--Purification--Activated sludge process ; Sewage--Purification--Oxidation
Additional Subjects Sewage treatment ; Activated sludge process ; Nitrification ; Oxygenation ; Performance evaluation ; Ammonia ; pH ; Calcium oxides ; Settling ; Reaction kinetics ; Tables(Data) ; District of Columbia
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=2000ZQAK.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EJBD  EPA 600-2-76-180 c.1 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 02/25/2014
ELBD ARCHIVE EPA 600-2-76-180 Received from HQ AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 10/04/2023
ELBD RPS EPA 600-2-76-180 repository copy AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 10/17/2014
ESAD  EPA 600-2-76-180 Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA 03/23/2010
NTIS  PB-262 197 Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. 07/26/2022
Collation ix, 57 p. : ill.; 28 cm.
Abstract
The nitrification capabilities of two oxygen activated sludge systems receiving District of Columbia secondary effluent at a steady state flow of 190 cu m/day (50,000 gpd) were evaluated. The pH of one system was controlled to maintain a pH of 7.0 in the last reactor pass of the four-pass system. The pH of the second system was uncontrolled and reactor pH values of 5.5-6.0 were common. Also parallel air and oxygen nitrification systems both with pH control were evaluated under similar operating conditions. Parameters used to compare the systems included effluent quality, sludge settling rates, lime dosage, sludge production and nitrification kinetic rates.
Notes
Bibliography p. 55-56.