Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 317 OF 814

Main Title Evaluation of the correlation spectrometer as an era SO2 monitor /
Author Sperling, R. B.
CORP Author Environmental Measurements, Inc., San Francisco, Calif.;Environmental Sciences Research Lab., Research Triangle Park, N.C. Emissions Measurement and Characterization Div.
Publisher Envionmemntal Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory ; For sale by the National Technical Information Service,
Year Published 1975
Report Number EPA-600/2-75-077; EPA-68-02-1773
Stock Number 22161
OCLC Number 03660412
ISBN pbk.
Subjects Remote sensing ; Sulfur dioxide ; Sulphur dioxide
Additional Subjects Monitors ; Sulfur dioxide ; Nitrogen dioxide ; Electrical power plants ; Remote sensing ; Monitoring ; Instruments ; Gas analysis ; Combustion products ; Mobility ; Field tests ; Ultraviolet spectrometers ; Performance evaluation ; Velocity measurement ; Wind velocity ; Experimental data ; Flue gases ; Comparison ; Coal ; Tables(Data) ; Air pollution detection ; Barringer COSPEC II correlation spectrometer
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=91014IUK.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EJBD  EPA 600-2-75-077 c.1 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 02/04/2014
EKBD  EPA-600/2-75-077 Research Triangle Park Library/RTP, NC 06/13/2003
ELBD ARCHIVE EPA 600-2-75-077 Received from HQ AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 10/04/2023
ESAD  EPA 600-2-75-077 Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA 03/23/2010
NTIS  PB-249 113 Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. 07/26/2022
Collation 15 unnumbered pages : illustrations ; 28 cm.
Abstract
A field evaluation was conducted of the Barringer Correlation Spectrometer (COSPEC) at a pulverized coal fired power plant. The Barringer COSPEC II instrument, an SO2 remote sensor, was compared to the manual in-stack SO2 and velocity compliance tests for emission measurements. The correlation for short term (one hour or less) comparison was poor. Higher correlations for SO2 emission rates on a daily basis were found. In addition to the COSPEC II, a COSPEC III and COSPEC IV were used in the study. Correlations among the three instruments were good (90-95%). Main source of error in the remote measurements was the wind velocity determinations. For a short time span of less than an hour, wind velocity may vary 100% and only averages can be obtained for the measurements.
Notes
Prepared under Contract No. 68-02-1773. "EPA-600/2-75-077." Issued Oct. 1975.